|
Newsroom
|
March 29th 2006 • Printer version WITHOUT REVERENCE FOR AUTHORITY: Why SCRAP still resonates
Litigator Neil Proto talks about
the case that opened the courts to environmental citizen suits
Washington D.C. attorney Neil Thomas Proto has spent 30 years putting teeth, flesh,
and blood on the dry bones of the law.
In 1970, he and four other law students formed Students Challenging
Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), defining and crafting arguments
to compel recalcitrant government agencies to make the new National
Environmental Policy Act a real force in law.
Their efforts resulted in
one of the most significant oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court
during the last 30 years: U.S. v SCRAP, the 1973 case that
established standing to sue and opened the courts to environmental
citizen suits.
Proto will deliver a free public lecture, followed by a booksigning, on Monday,
April 10 at 7 p.m.
in the Many Nations Longhouse, directly behind the law school on the
University of Oregon campus in Eugene. He will discuss his book about
the famous case, To A High Court: The Tumult and Choices that Led to United States of America.
v. SCRAP.
His visit is sponsored by the UO law schools Environmental and Natural
Resources Law Program. ENR Program Manager Heather Brinton said,
If not for this case, ordinary citizens may have had no legal way to
voice their objections to the billboards, malls, mines, and theme parks
that continually threaten to overtake the historical and natural areas
that make up our birthright. And law students not experienced
attorneys made it happen! A year or two before that, Proto represented the
state of Hawaii in
drafting a unique statutoryscheme that resulted in the island of
Kahoolawe returning to the control and use of Native Hawaiians.
Proto is a partner at the international firm of Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Washington, D.C. office. The firm is known for its complex litigation track record and pro bono work. He has represented both public and private entities in their legal, cultural and political fights for and against dams, malls, prisons, airports, mining operations and the use of natural resources. -Eliza Schmidkunz
|
WITHOUT REVERENCE FOR AUTHORITY:
Neil Proto has spent the rest of his career developing the theme he
established in law school - in 1995, he represented, pro bono, an ad
hoc committee of authors and historians in their effort to stop the
Walt Disney Company from building a theme park in the Virginia
Piedmont, a historic area of rolling hills and small farms near both
the Manassas Civil War battlefield and the White House. Within a year,
Disney had abandoned the project.
drafting a unique statutory